Auction and the informed seller problem
نویسندگان
چکیده
A seller possessing private information about the quality of a good attempts to sell it through a second-price auction with announced reserve price. The choice of a reserve price transmits information to the buyers. We compare the outcome of a game where the seller runs himself the auction (signaling) and a game where a monopoly broker chooses the trade mechanism (screening). For the former case, we characterize the equilibria of the resulting signaling game and show that they lead to reduced levels of sale compared to the symmetric situation. We compare the unique separating equilibrium with the outcome that would be chosen by the monopoly broker. The ex-ante expected probability of trade may be larger with a monopoly broker, as well as the ex-ante total expected surplus. ∗We wish to thank Bruno Biais, Bernard Caillaud, David Martimort, Benny Moldovanu and JeanCharles Rochet, as well as seminar participants at Toulouse University, for insighful comments. †University of Toulouse (GREMAQ and IDEI), 21 Allée de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France. Email: [email protected]. ‡University of Toulouse (GREMAQ), 21 Allée de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France, LSE and CEPR. E-mail: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Auction Selection by an Informed Seller
We analyze selection of an auction format by an informed seller. We model a game with two stages: first, an informed seller announces a good for sale and chooses an auction format from a set of standard auctions; second, privately informed bidders compete for the object. The game has an important signaling element as the auction choice may signal the seller’s type. We study both private and com...
متن کاملNew Multi Attributes Procurement Auction for Agent- Based Supply Chain Formation
Multi Attributes Procurement Auction is a well known solution for negotiation between sellers and buyers. Seller wants to sell the product with more prices while buyer wants to buy the product with fewer prices. This problem has been analyzed by game theory approach and one optimal solution is achieved for the seller and the buyer with this assumption that the seller knows the exact value of th...
متن کاملAuctions Versus Negotiations Revisited∗
Auctions are compared with different forms of negotiation and bargaining. The value of an extra customer is shown to exceed the value of being able to ration supply, if the seller is otherwise unconstrained. Thus, we generalize and provide a simple proof of a result due to Bulow and Klemperer (1996), in which auctions and negotiations are compared. We also compare auctions and seller-offer barg...
متن کاملOptimal auctions with ambiguity
A crucial assumption in the optimal auction literature is that each bidder’s valuation is known to be drawn from a unique distribution. In this paper, we study the optimal auction problem allowing for ambiguity about the distribution of valuations. Agents may be ambiguity averse (modeled using the maxmin expected utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler 1989). When the bidders face more ambiguity...
متن کاملMechanism Design in Social Networks
This paper studies an auction design problem for a seller to sell a commodity in a social network, where each individual (the seller or a buyer) can only communicate with her neighbors. The challenge to the seller is to design a mechanism to incentivize the buyers, who are aware of the auction, to further propagate the information to their neighbors so that more buyers will participate in the a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 56 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006